Question · asked by 1 review
Immunonutrition vs control: All‐cause mortality
- Population
- patients with acute pancreatitis
- Intervention
- Immunonutrition
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- All‐cause mortality
Immunonutrition may leads to lower all‐cause mortality compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Immunonutrition vs control All‐cause mortality · patients with acute pancreatitis Immunonutrition may leads to lower all‐cause mortality compared with control (low certainty). Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.49 [0.29, 0.8] | 6 studies · 520 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Immunonutrition vs standard nutritional supplements · 1 review
- Immunonutrition vs usual care · patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.