Question · asked by 1 review
Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support vs no walking training: Quality of life (not measured)
- Population
- children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to III between 5 and 19 years of age
- Intervention
- Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support
- Comparison
- no walking training
- Outcome
- Quality of life (not measured)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support vs no walking training Quality of life (not measured) · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to III between 5 and 19 years of age The review found no eligible studies for this question. Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanically assisted walking training for walking, participation, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Mechanically assisted walking training without body weight support vs the same dose of overground walking training · children with cerebral palsy classified within GMFCS Levels I to III and between 3 and… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.