Question · asked by 1 review
80 mL vs Foley catheter: Caesarean section
- Population
- pregnant women who previously had a lower segment CS and now have a singleton cephalic presentation after at least 36 completed weeks, not in labour, with intact membranes and BS of < 6
- Intervention
- 80 mL
- Comparison
- Foley catheter
- Outcome
- Caesarean section
80 mL showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with 30 mL Foley catheter (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
80 mL vs 30 mL Foley catheter Caesarean section · pregnant women who previously had a lower segment CS and now have a singleton cephalic presentation after at least 36… 80 mL showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with 30 mL Foley catheter (moderate certainty). Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.05 [0.89, 1.24] | 1 study · 154 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.