Question · asked by 1 review
rTMS + pharmacotherapy vs sham rTMS + pharmacotherapy: Quality of life Short‐Form 36 health survey (SF‐36)
- Population
- participants with panic disorder
- Intervention
- rTMS + pharmacotherapy
- Comparison
- sham rTMS + pharmacotherapy
- Outcome
- Quality of life Short‐Form 36 health survey (SF‐36)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
rTMS + pharmacotherapy vs sham rTMS + pharmacotherapy Quality of life (such as the SF‐36 Health Survey (Ware 1992) · participants with panic disorder The review found no eligible studies for this question. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.