Question · asked by 1 review
Diamond burr superficial keratectomy (after epithelial debridement) vs sham diamond burr (after epithelial debridement): Symptoms (pain score)
- Population
- people with recurrent corneal erosion syndrome without other corneal basement membrane dystrophy
- Intervention
- Diamond burr superficial keratectomy (after epithelial debridement)
- Comparison
- sham diamond burr (after epithelial debridement)
- Outcome
- Symptoms (pain score)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Diamond burr superficial keratectomy (after epithelial debridement) vs sham diamond burr (after epithelial debridement) Symptoms (pain score) · people with recurrent corneal erosion syndrome without other corneal basement membrane dystrophy The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for recurrent corneal erosions (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for recurrent corneal erosions 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.