Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) vs hemiarthroplasty: Self‐reported shoulder function
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) vs hemiarthroplasty Self‐reported shoulder function: % of normal shoulder function based on WOOS score (higher = better outcome) · adults undergoing surgery for displaced proximal humeral fracturesa (2 trials) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 65 participants | Very low |
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) vs hemiarthroplasty Self‐reported shoulder function · adults undergoing surgery for displaced proximal humeral fracturesa (2 trials) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) vs hemiarthroplasty Self‐reported shoulder function: QuickDASH (0 to 55: worst disability); % of normal shoulder function based on WOOS score (higher = better outcome) · adults undergoing surgery for displaced proximal humeral fracturesa (2 trials) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 61 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.