Question · asked by 1 review
Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes vs alternative IPC intervention: Collaborative behaviour outcomes
- Population
- health and social care professionals involved in the delivery of health services and patient care
- Intervention
- Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
- Comparison
- alternative IPC intervention
- Outcome
- Collaborative behaviour outcomes
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes vs alternative IPC intervention Collaborative behaviour outcomes · health and social care professionals involved in the delivery of health services and patient care Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 100 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.