Question · asked by 1 review

PDHA program vs Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario: Significant caries index

Population
Alaska children
Intervention
PDHA program
Comparison
Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario
Outcome
Significant caries index

The PDHA program was projected to reduce the SiC index 50% from 12.3 to 6.1 for children, without a GRADE rating.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
PDHA program vs Baseline pre-intervention scenario
Significant caries index · Alaska children · 20 years, Alaska, Children
The PDHA program was projected to reduce the SiC index 50% from 12.3 to 6.1 for children, without a GRADE rating.
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013) All outcomes
Percent reduction in SiC index 501 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions and a case study on multilevel…
2013 All outcomes
October 5, 201211Critically Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.