Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings: EBRT vs no EBRT: Death from all causes

Summary of findings: EBRT showed no clear difference in death from all causes compared with no EBRT (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings: EBRT vs no EBRT
Death from all causes · women with stage I endometrial cancer
Summary of findings: EBRT showed no clear difference in death from all causes compared with no EBRT (moderate certainty).
Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD003916.PUB3, superseded
HR 0.99 [0.82, 1.2]2628 participantsModerate
Summary of findings: EBRT vs no EBRT
Death from all causes · women with stage I endometrial cancer
Summary of findings: EBRT showed no clear difference in death from all causes compared with no EBRT (moderate certainty).
Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 0.99 [0.82, 1.2]2628 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer
2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.