Question · asked by 1 review

Autogenic drainage vs conventional physiotherapy: Participant preference

Population
adults and children with CF
Intervention
Autogenic drainage
Comparison
conventional physiotherapy
Outcome
Participant preference

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Autogenic drainage vs conventional physiotherapy
Participant preference · adults and children with CF
Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsVery low
Autogenic drainage vs conventional physiotherapy
Participant preference · adults and children with CF
Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD009595.PUB2, superseded
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Autogenic drainage for airway clearance in cystic fibrosis
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.