Question · asked by 1 review
Pre-operative caries fillings or crowns vs Intact teeth: Pulp necrosis
- Population
- Vital teeth
- Intervention
- Pre-operative caries fillings or crowns
- Comparison
- Intact teeth
- Outcome
- Pulp necrosis
One study reported a 13% incidence in teeth with pre-operative caries fillings or crowns.
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pre-operative caries fillings or crowns vs Intact teeth Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Pre-operative caries fillings or crowns One study reported a 13% incidence in teeth with pre-operative caries fillings or crowns. Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023) All outcomes | Proportion 13 | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Pre-operative caries fillings or crowns vs Intact teeth Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Intact teeth One study reported a 5% incidence in intact teeth. Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023) All outcomes | Proportion 5 | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations: a systematic review and… 2023 All outcomes | December 2022 (initial search October 2021, updated December 2022) | 68 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.