Question · asked by 0 reviews

Continuous CTG vs intermittent auscultation: Caesarean section

Population
Women undergoing fetal assessment during labour
Intervention
Continuous CTG
Comparison
intermittent auscultation
Outcome
Caesarean section

Continuous CTG may leads to higher caesarean section (primary outcome) compared with intermittent auscultation (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Continuous CTG vs intermittent auscultation
Caesarean section (primary outcome) · Women undergoing fetal assessment during labour
Continuous CTG may leads to higher caesarean section (primary outcome) compared with intermittent auscultation (low certainty).
Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during… (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD006066.PUB2, superseded
RR 1.63 [1.29, 2.07]11 studies · 18861 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.