Question · asked by 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no prophylaxis: Symptomatic DVT

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin showed no clear difference in symptomatic DVT: assessed by presence of symptoms and confirmed by a… compared with no prophylaxis (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin vs no prophylaxis
Symptomatic DVT: assessed by presence of symptoms and confirmed by a positive compression ultrasound ( · adults undergoing KA
Low‐molecular‐weight heparin showed no clear difference in symptomatic DVT: assessed by presence of symptoms and confirmed by a… compared with no prophylaxis (low certainty).
Interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.61 [0.18, 2.03]4 studies · 1848 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.