Question · asked by 1 review
Virtual reality distraction vs no distraction: Adverse effects (related to engagement with VR)
- Population
- children (0 to 18 years)
- Intervention
- Virtual reality distraction
- Comparison
- no distraction
- Outcome
- Adverse effects (related to engagement with VR)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Virtual reality distraction vs no distraction Adverse effects (related to engagement with VR) · children (0 to 18 years) Virtual reality distraction for acute pain in children (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 154 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual reality distraction for acute pain in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Virtual reality distraction vs non‐VR distraction · children (0 to 18 years) · 1 review
- Virtual reality distraction vs other VR distraction · children (0‐18 years) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.