Question · asked by 1 review

Dementia (any type or severity) vs Older people without dementia: Edentulousness (prevalence)

Edentulousness was similar in older people with and without dementia, with wide overlapping ranges across studies; no meta-analysis was performed (ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Dementia (any type or severity) vs Older people without dementia
Edentulousness (prevalence) · Older people (aged 60 years or older) with dementia · Older people aged 60 years or older; community-dwelling, assisted-living, and nursing-home settings
Edentulousness was similar in older people with and without dementia, with wide overlapping ranges across studies; no meta-analysis was performed (ungraded).
Oral health and orofacial pain in older people with dementia: a systematic review with focus on dental hard… (2017) All outcomes
no estimate extracted11 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Oral health and orofacial pain in older people with dementia: a systematic review with focus on dental hard tissues.
2017 All outcomes
2016-03-3139Not applicable

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.