Therapist‐supported ICBT vs waiting list, attention, information, or online discussion group only control: Clinically important improvement in anxiety at post‐treatment Indexed by a standardized interview or clinically accepted measure cut‐off score1
Therapist‐supported ICBT may leads to higher clinically important improvement in anxiety at post‐treatment… compared with waiting list, attention, information, or online discussion group… (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Therapist‐supported ICBT vs waiting list, attention, information, or online discussion group only control Clinically important improvement in anxiety at post‐treatment Indexed by a standardized interview or clinically accepted measure cut‐off score1 · patients with anxiety disorders Therapist‐supported ICBT may leads to higher clinically important improvement in anxiety at post‐treatment… compared with waiting list, attention, information, or online discussion group… (low certainty). Therapist‐supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 3.75 [2.51, 5.6] | 12 studies · 866 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Therapist‐supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.