Question · asked by 1 review

Ball (stud) attachment system vs Bar attachment system: Cost (treatment time and/or material costs)

Population
Edentulous adults receiving mandibular implant overdentures (opposing conventional complete maxillary dentures)
Intervention
Ball (stud) attachment system
Comparison
Bar attachment system
Outcome
Cost (treatment time and/or material costs)

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Ball (stud) attachment system vs Bar attachment system
Cost (treatment time and/or material costs) · Edentulous adults receiving mandibular implant overdentures (opposing conventional complete maxillary dentures)
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes
Walton 2002 reported costs but the data could not be used due to failure to report means and standard deviations and only providing the median of the costs.1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws
2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
2018-01Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.