Question · asked by 1 review

Acute to Chronic MND: Scapulothoracic + UE Strengthening vs control: Function: DASH 20% no difficulty to 100% fully unable (

It is very uncertain whether acute to Chronic MND: Scapulothoracic + UE Strengthening changes function: DASH 20% no difficulty to 100% fully unable ( compared with CONTROL (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Acute to Chronic MND: Scapulothoracic + UE Strengthening vs CONTROL
Function: DASH 20% no difficulty to 100% fully unable ( · patients with Acute to Chronic MND
It is very uncertain whether acute to Chronic MND: Scapulothoracic + UE Strengthening changes function: DASH 20% no difficulty to 100% fully unable ( compared with CONTROL (very low certainty).
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted1 study · 163 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders
2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.