Question · asked by 1 review
Therapist‐supported ICBT vs face‐to‐face CBT: Adverse events at post‐treatment ‐ not reported
- Population
- adults with anxiety disorders
- Intervention
- Therapist‐supported ICBT
- Comparison
- face‐to‐face CBT
- Outcome
- Adverse events at post‐treatment ‐ not reported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Therapist‐supported ICBT vs face‐to‐face CBT Adverse events at post‐treatment ‐ not reported · adults with anxiety disorders The review found no eligible studies for this question. Therapist‐supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Therapist‐supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.