Question · asked by 1 review

Radix tripterygium hypoglaucum tablet (THT) vs Tripterygium glucosides tablet (TGT): Partial response (remarkably effective or effective)

Population
People with erosive oral lichen planus
Intervention
Radix tripterygium hypoglaucum tablet (THT)
Comparison
Tripterygium glucosides tablet (TGT)
Outcome
Partial response (remarkably effective or effective)

Radix tripterygium hypoglaucum tablet (THT) led to lower partial response (remarkably effective or effective) compared with tripterygium glucosides tablet (TGT); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Radix tripterygium hypoglaucum tablet (THT) vs Tripterygium glucosides tablet (TGT)
Partial response (remarkably effective or effective) · People with erosive oral lichen planus · Grade I (erosive and ulcerative lesions)
Radix tripterygium hypoglaucum tablet (THT) led to lower partial response (remarkably effective or effective) compared with tripterygium glucosides tablet (TGT); GRADE not reported.
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 0.18 [0.04, 0.82]1 study · 94 participantsGRADE not reported
Radix tripterygium hypoglaucum tablet (THT) vs Tripterygium glucosides tablet (TGT)
Partial response (remarkably effective or effective) · People with erosive oral lichen planus · Grade II (erosive lesions only)
Radix tripterygium hypoglaucum tablet (THT) showed no clear difference in partial response (remarkably effective or effective) compared with tripterygium glucosides tablet (TGT); GRADE not reported.
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 0.29 [0.07, 1.27]1 study · 94 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites
2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
2009-09Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.