Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth vs No treatment (or delayed treatment): Gingival and TMJ symptoms
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent teeth (removable, fixed, or functional braces, or headgear) vs No treatment (or delayed treatment) Gingival and TMJ symptoms · Children (aged < 16 years) with a Class II division 2 malocclusion (deep bite and upright/retroclined upper front teeth) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children (2006) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD005972, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-11 | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.