Condiments/seasonings fortified with iron plus other micronutrients vs condiments/seasonings fortified with other micronutrients except iron: Anaemia
Condiments/seasonings fortified with iron plus other micronutrients may leads to lower anaemia (defined as haemoglobin below WHO cut‐off for age and… compared with condiments/seasonings fortified with other micronutrients except iron (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Condiments/seasonings fortified with iron plus other micronutrients vs condiments/seasonings fortified with other micronutrients except iron Anaemia (defined as haemoglobin below WHO cut‐off for age and adjusted for altitude as appropriate) · population aged 2 years and above (Andersson 2008 ‐ 5‐18 years, Asibey‐Berko 2007 ~ 3 years, Chen Ke 2008 ‐ 2‐6 years,… Condiments/seasonings fortified with iron plus other micronutrients may leads to lower anaemia (defined as haemoglobin below WHO cut‐off for age and… compared with condiments/seasonings fortified with other micronutrients except iron (low certainty). Fortification of condiments and seasonings with iron for preventing anaemia and improving health (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.59 [0.4, 0.89] | 4 studies · 1007 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortification of condiments and seasonings with iron for preventing anaemia and improving health 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.