Question · asked by 1 review
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Not applicable (single-arm safety outcome): Serious adverse events
- Population
- Children and older adults treated with SDF for carious lesions
- Intervention
- Silver diamine fluoride (SDF)
- Comparison
- Not applicable (single-arm safety outcome)
- Outcome
- Serious adverse events
No serious adverse events (e.g., allergic reactions or toxicity) were reported for SDF across the reviews (ungraded).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Silver diamine fluoride vs Not applicable (single-arm safety outcome) Serious adverse events · Children and older adults treated with SDF for carious lesions No serious adverse events (e.g., allergic reactions or toxicity) were reported for SDF across the reviews (ungraded). Silver diamine fluoride for managing carious lesions: an umbrella review. (2019) All outcomes | No serious adverse events, such as allergic reactions or toxicity, were reported. A metallic taste or burning sensation was not reported in any of the studies. | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silver diamine fluoride for managing carious lesions: an umbrella review. 2019 All outcomes | June 2018 | 15 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.