Summary of findings table – disulfiram vs placebo or no pharmacological treatment: Point abstinence (number of participants who were abstinent at the end of the treatment)
- Population
- patients with the treatment of cocaine dependence
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table – disulfiram
- Comparison
- placebo or no pharmacological treatment
- Outcome
- Point abstinence (number of participants who were abstinent at the end of the treatment)
Summary of findings table – disulfiram may leads to higher point abstinence (number of participants who were abstinent at the… compared with placebo or no pharmacological treatment (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table – disulfiram vs placebo or no pharmacological treatment Point abstinence (number of participants who were abstinent at the end of the treatment) · people with cocaine dependence Summary of findings table – disulfiram may leads to higher point abstinence (number of participants who were abstinent at the… compared with placebo or no pharmacological treatment (low certainty). Disulfiram for the treatment of cocaine dependence (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.58 [1.05, 2.36] | 2 studies · 142 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disulfiram for the treatment of cocaine dependence 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Summary of findings table – disulfiram vs naltrexone · patients with the treatment of cocaine dependence · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.