Scheduled surveillance vs clinical monitoring alone: All‐cause mortality
Scheduled surveillance showed no clear difference in mortality compared with clinical monitoring alone (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Scheduled surveillance vs clinical monitoring alone Mortality · people receiving haemodialysis to treat kidney failure and using a functioning AV access for haemodialysis. Scheduled surveillance showed no clear difference in mortality compared with clinical monitoring alone (low certainty). Pre‐emptive correction for haemodialysis arteriovenous access stenosis (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.38 [0.9, 2.11] | 5 studies · 586 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre‐emptive correction for haemodialysis arteriovenous access stenosis 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.