Question · asked by 1 review
PDHA program vs Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario: Dental caries
- Population
- Alaska children below age 5 years
- Intervention
- PDHA program
- Comparison
- Baseline pre-intervention service-delivery scenario
- Outcome
- Dental caries
The PDHA program was projected to reduce mean DMFT in children below age 5 from 7.4 to 4.9, without a GRADE rating.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
PDHA program vs Baseline pre-intervention scenario Mean decayed missing and filled teeth · Alaska children below age 5 years · 20 years, Alaska The PDHA program was projected to reduce mean DMFT in children below age 5 from 7.4 to 4.9, without a GRADE rating. Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013) All outcomes | Mean DMFT 7.4 to 4.9 | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions and a case study on multilevel… 2013 All outcomes | October 5, 2012 | 11 | Critically Low / Critically Low |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.