Question · asked by 1 review

Psychological interventions vs usual care: Number of foot ulcer recurrences

Population
adults with diabetes with current or previous foot ulceration
Intervention
Psychological interventions
Comparison
usual care
Outcome
Number of foot ulcer recurrences

It is very uncertain whether psychological intervention changes number of foot ulcer recurrences at 1 year compared with standard care (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Psychological intervention vs standard care
Number of foot ulcer recurrences at 1 year · adults with diabetes with current or previous foot ulceration
It is very uncertain whether psychological intervention changes number of foot ulcer recurrences at 1 year compared with standard care (very low certainty).
Psychological interventions for treating foot ulcers, and preventing their recurrence, in people with diabetes (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.672 studies · 54 participantsVery low
Psychological intervention vs standard care
Number of foot ulcer recurrences at 6 months · adults with diabetes with current or previous foot ulceration
It is very uncertain whether psychological intervention changes number of foot ulcer recurrences at 6 months compared with standard care (very low certainty).
Psychological interventions for treating foot ulcers, and preventing their recurrence, in people with diabetes (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.632 studies · 54 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Psychological interventions for treating foot ulcers, and preventing their recurrence, in people with diabetes
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.