Question · asked by 1 review

Casirivimab/imdevimab vs placebo: Grades 3 and 4 adverse events

Population
SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Intervention
Casirivimab/imdevimab
Comparison
placebo
Outcome
Grades 3 and 4 adverse events

It is very uncertain whether casirivimab/imdevimab changes adverse events: grade 3 to 4 within 6 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Casirivimab/imdevimab vs placebo
Adverse events: grade 3 to 4 within 6 months · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
It is very uncertain whether casirivimab/imdevimab changes adverse events: grade 3 to 4 within 6 months compared with placebo (very low certainty).
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID‐19 (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.44 [0.1, 1.95]1 study · 969 participantsVery low
Casirivimab/imdevimab vs placebo
Adverse events: grade 3 to 4 until data cut‐offb · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
Casirivimab/imdevimab showed no clear difference in adverse events: grade 3 to 4 until data cut‐offb compared with placebo (low certainty).
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID‐19 (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.5 [0.24, 1.02]1 study · 2617 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID‐19
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.