Use of initial sustained inflation vs standard inflations: Death ‒in the delivery room
Use of initial sustained inflation showed no clear difference in death ‒in the delivery room compared with standard inflations (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Use of initial sustained inflation vs standard inflations Death ‒in the delivery room · preterm infants resuscitated by PPV at birth Use of initial sustained inflation showed no clear difference in death ‒in the delivery room compared with standard inflations (low certainty). Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 2.66 [0.11, 63.4] | 5 studies · 479 participants | Low |
Use of initial sustained inflation vs standard inflations Death ‐ death in the delivery room · preterm infants resuscitated using PPV at birth Use of initial sustained inflation showed no clear difference in death ‐ death in the delivery room compared with standard inflations (low certainty). Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD004953.PUB3, superseded | RR 2.66 [0.11, 63.4] | 5 studies · 479 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve respiratory outcomes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.