Question · asked by 1 review
Acupuncture at P6 point vs sham: Successful completion of dental procedure
- Population
- People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials enrolled adults
- Intervention
- Acupuncture at P6 point
- Comparison
- sham
- Outcome
- Successful completion of dental procedure
It is very uncertain whether acupuncture at P6 point changes successful completion of dental procedure compared with sham acupuncture (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Acupuncture at P6 point vs Sham acupuncture Successful completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials… It is very uncertain whether acupuncture at P6 point changes successful completion of dental procedure compared with sham acupuncture (very low certainty). Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 1.78 [1.05, 3.01] | 2 studies · 59 participants | Very low |
Acupuncture at P6 point vs Sham acupuncture Successful completion of dental procedure · People (older than four years) classified as having gagging that interfered with dental treatment; included trials… It is very uncertain whether acupuncture at P6 point changes successful completion of dental procedure compared with sham acupuncture (very low certainty). Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment (2015) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD011116.PUB2, superseded | RR 1.65 [0.59, 4.57] | 1 study · 33 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Management of gag reflex for patients undergoing dental treatment 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.