Question · asked by 1 review

Calcineurin inhibitors ± steroids vs placebo/no treatment/supportive treatment/steroids: Relapse

It is very uncertain whether calcineurin inhibitors ± steroids changes recurrence of disease (relapse) at final compared with placebo/no treatment/supportive treatment/steroids (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Calcineurin inhibitors ± steroids vs placebo/no treatment/supportive treatment/steroids
Recurrence of disease (relapse) at final · primary membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome
It is very uncertain whether calcineurin inhibitors ± steroids changes recurrence of disease (relapse) at final compared with placebo/no treatment/supportive treatment/steroids (very low certainty).
Immunosuppressive treatment for primary membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.56 [0.79, 3.09]2 studies · 92 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Immunosuppressive treatment for primary membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.