Question · asked by 1 review
Laparoscopic gastric bypass vs laparoscopic duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: SAEs
- Population
- participants with obesity
- Intervention
- Laparoscopic gastric bypass
- Comparison
- laparoscopic duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy
- Outcome
- SAEs
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Laparoscopic gastric bypass vs laparoscopic duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy Serious adverse events (SAEs) · participants with obesity The review found no eligible studies for this question. Surgery for weight loss in adults (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery for weight loss in adults 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Laparoscopic gastric bypass vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy · participants with obesity · 1 review
- Laparoscopic gastric bypass vs laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding · participants with obesity · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.