Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin vs control: Definite necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) during study period

Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin showed no clear difference in definite necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) during study period compared with control (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin vs control
Definite necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) during study period · preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm and low birth weight neonates
Summary of findings table for oral immunoglobulin showed no clear difference in definite necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) during study period compared with control (low certainty).
Oral immunoglobulin for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm and low birth weight neonates (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.84 [0.57, 1.25]3 studies · 1840 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Oral immunoglobulin for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm and low birth weight neonates
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.