CRISIS INTERVENTION vs usual care: Hospital use Repeat admissions excluding index admission
CRISIS INTERVENTION showed no clear difference in hospital use Repeat admissions excluding index admission compared with STANDARD CARE (high certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CRISIS INTERVENTION vs STANDARD CARE Hospital use Repeat admissions excluding index admission · patients with people with severe mental illnesses CRISIS INTERVENTION showed no clear difference in hospital use Repeat admissions excluding index admission compared with STANDARD CARE (high certainty). Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.75 [0.5, 1.13] | 1 study · 369 participants | High |
CRISIS INTERVENTION vs STANDARD CARE Hospital use Repeat admissions excluding index admission · patients with people with severe mental illnesses CRISIS INTERVENTION leads to lower hospital use Repeat admissions excluding index admission compared with STANDARD CARE (high certainty). Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD001087.PUB4, superseded | RR 0.62 [0.51, 0.76] | 1 study · 258 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crisis intervention for people with severe mental illnesses 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.