Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Convalescent plasma vs placebo or usual care: Clinical worsening: need for invasive mechanical ventilation, or death at up to day 28

Population
individuals with moderate to severe disease
Intervention
Summary of findings table ‐ Convalescent plasma
Comparison
placebo or usual care
Outcome
Clinical worsening: need for invasive mechanical ventilation, or death at up to day 28

Summary of findings table ‐ Convalescent plasma showed no clear difference in clinical worsening: need for invasive mechanical ventilation, or… compared with placebo or standard care alone (high certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 2 · 100%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings table ‐ Convalescent plasma vs placebo or standard care alone
Clinical worsening: need for invasive mechanical ventilation, or death at up to day 28 · individualswith moderate to severe disease
Summary of findings table ‐ Convalescent plasma showed no clear difference in clinical worsening: need for invasive mechanical ventilation, or… compared with placebo or standard care alone (high certainty).
Convalescent plasma for people with COVID‐19: a living systematic review (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD013600.PUB5, superseded
RR 1.03 [0.97, 1.11]6 studies · 14477 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table ‐ Convalescent plasma vs placebo or standard care alone
Clinical worsening: need for invasive mechanical ventilation, or death at up to day 28 · individualswith moderate to severe disease
Summary of findings table ‐ Convalescent plasma showed no clear difference in clinical worsening: need for invasive mechanical ventilation, or… compared with placebo or standard care alone (high certainty).
Convalescent plasma for people with COVID‐19: a living systematic review (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.03 [0.97, 1.11]6 studies · 14477 participantsHigh

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Convalescent plasma for people with COVID‐19: a living systematic review
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.