Primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) vs no CPM: Adverse events (a count of reported harms or adverse events/experiences over life of study/
Primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) showed no clear difference in adverse events Counts of adverse events compared with no CPM (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) vs no CPM Adverse events Counts of adverse events · hospitalised patients who have undergone knee replacement surgery Primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) showed no clear difference in adverse events Counts of adverse events compared with no CPM (low certainty). Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.92 [0.63, 1.33] | 16 studies · 1040 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.