Question · asked by 1 review
Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) vs Bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier: Change in gingival recession (REC)
- Population
- People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis
- Intervention
- Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim)
- Comparison
- Bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier
- Outcome
- Change in gingival recession (REC)
Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) showed no clear difference in change in gingival recession (REC) compared with bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) vs Bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier Change in gingival recession (REC) · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 4 years Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) showed no clear difference in change in gingival recession (REC) compared with bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -0.10 [-0.51, 0.31] | 1 study · 22 participants | GRADE not reported |
Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) vs Bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier Change in gingival recession (REC) · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis · 4 years Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) showed no clear difference in change in gingival recession (REC) compared with bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2010) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004970.PUB4, superseded | MD -0.10 [-0.51, 0.31] | 1 study · 22 participants | GRADE not reported |
Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) vs Bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier Change in gingival recession (REC) · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis · 6 months Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) showed no clear difference in change in gingival recession (REC) compared with bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2008) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004970.PUB3, superseded | No statistically significant differences for change in REC at 6 months (0.3 mm in both groups). | 1 study · 22 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2011-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.