Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Manual toothbrush: Gingivitis
- Population
- Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified
- Intervention
- Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
- Comparison
- Manual toothbrush
- Outcome
- Gingivitis
Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) showed no clear difference in gingival inflammation (short term) compared with conventional manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted… (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Conventional manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) Gingival inflammation (short term) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Short term (<6 weeks) Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) showed no clear difference in gingival inflammation (short term) compared with conventional manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted… (low certainty). Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -0.10 [-0.77, 0.57] | 1 study · 25 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.