Question · asked by 1 review

Chlorhexidine vs Cryotherapy (ice chips) 60 minutes: Oral mucositis (any severity)

Population
Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapies
Intervention
Chlorhexidine
Comparison
Cryotherapy (ice chips) 60 minutes
Outcome
Oral mucositis (any severity)

Chlorhexidine showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (any severity) compared with cryotherapy (ice chips); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Chlorhexidine vs Cryotherapy (ice chips)
Oral mucositis (any severity) · Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapies · Median 28 days
Chlorhexidine showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (any severity) compared with cryotherapy (ice chips); GRADE not reported.
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2011) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 1.03 [0.76, 1.41]1 study · 133 participantsGRADE not reported
Chlorhexidine vs Cryotherapy (ice chips)
Oral mucositis (any severity) · Patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapies · Median 28 days
Chlorhexidine showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (any severity) compared with cryotherapy (ice chips); GRADE not reported.
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment (2010) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD000978.PUB4, superseded
RR 1.03 [0.76, 1.41]1 study · 133 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment
2011 · Cochrane All outcomes
2011-02Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.