Question · asked by 1 review

Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation vs control (usual care/other rehabilitation): Revascularisation (CABG and PCI combined)

Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation showed no clear difference in revascularisation (CABG and PCI combined) compared with control (usual care/other rehabilitation) (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation vs control (usual care/other rehabilitation)
Revascularisation (CABG and PCI combined) · people with coronary heart disease (third update)
Psychological intervention with or without other rehabilitation showed no clear difference in revascularisation (CABG and PCI combined) compared with control (usual care/other rehabilitation) (moderate certainty).
Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.94 [0.81, 1.11]13 studies · 6822 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.