Question · asked by 1 review
Early childhood caries (ECC) vs Caries-free controls: Number of detected salivary bacterial genera
- Population
- Young children with early childhood caries and caries-free controls
- Intervention
- Early childhood caries (ECC)
- Comparison
- Caries-free controls
- Outcome
- Number of detected salivary bacterial genera
Fewer salivary bacterial genera were reported in the caries-affected group, without a comparative effect estimate or CI.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Early childhood caries vs Caries-free controls Number of detected salivary bacterial genera · Young children with early childhood caries and caries-free controls · Hong Kong Fewer salivary bacterial genera were reported in the caries-affected group, without a comparative effect estimate or CI. A systematic review of Streptococcus Mutans and Veillonellae species interactions in dental caries… (2025) All outcomes | Number of genera caries-affected 117 vs caries-free 123 genera | 1 study · 40 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A systematic review of Streptococcus Mutans and Veillonellae species interactions in dental caries progression: Positive or Negative impact? 2024 All outcomes | 18 July 2023 (databases searched from inception) | 7 | Not applicable |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.