Question · asked by 1 review
Electromechanical‐ and robotic‐assisted gait training plus physiotherapy vs usual care or physiotherapy: Walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s) and metres/minute (m/min). A higher score indicates faster walking.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Electromechanical‐ and robot‐assisted gait training plus physiotherapy vs physiotherapy (or usual care) Mean walking velocity (secondary outcome; metres per second) · patients walking after stroke Electromechanical‐assisted training for walking after stroke (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 42 studies · 1600 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electromechanical‐assisted training for walking after stroke 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.