Question · asked by 1 review
nCaF2 primer vs Control Transbond primer: Streptococcus mutans count
- Population
- Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond)
- Intervention
- nCaF2 primer
- Comparison
- Control Transbond primer
- Outcome
- Streptococcus mutans count
nCaF2 primer differed in S. mutans count only at T1, with certainty not graded.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
nCaF2 primer vs Control Transbond primer Streptococcus mutans count · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · 1, 3, and 6 months after bonding, Fixed orthodontic treatment nCaF2 primer differed in S. mutans count only at T1, with certainty not graded. Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024) All outcomes | Statistically significant difference in bacterial count between the two primers only at T1 (p-value = 0.000). | 1 study · 31 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment? A… 2024 All outcomes | October 2023 | 12 | High / Low |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.