Question · asked by 1 review
Fibre supplementation vs no intervention: Primary outcome ‐ pain on defecation ‐ not reported
- Population
- women with treating constipation in pregnancy
- Intervention
- Fibre supplementation
- Comparison
- no intervention
- Outcome
- Primary outcome ‐ pain on defecation ‐ not reported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fibre supplementation vs no intervention Primary outcome ‐ pain on defecation ‐ not reported · Women being treated for constipation in pregnancy The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for treating constipation in pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for treating constipation in pregnancy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.