Question · asked by 1 review
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown): Patient satisfaction / quality of life (validated measure)
- Population
- People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment
- Intervention
- Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post
- Comparison
- Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown)
- Outcome
- Patient satisfaction / quality of life (validated measure)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown) Patient satisfaction and quality of life (any validated instrument) · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment The review found no eligible studies for this question. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2015) · Cochrane All outcomes | This outcome was not reported nor measured by the study. The abstract confirms no evidence was available for any secondary outcome. | Not reported | No studies found |
Single full-coverage metal-ceramic crown over composite core and post vs Direct adhesive composite restoration with post (conventional filling, no crown) Patient satisfaction and quality of life (any validated instrument) · People with a permanent tooth that has undergone endodontic (root canal) treatment The review found no eligible studies for this question. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth (2012) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD009109.PUB2, superseded | This outcome was not reported in the study. | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root‐filled teeth 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2015-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.