Effect of reducing saturated fat vs usual saturated fat on CVD risk: Myocardial infarction
It is very uncertain whether effect of reducing saturated fat changes myocardial infarctions compared with usual saturated fat on CVD risk (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Effect of reducing saturated fat vs usual saturated fat on CVD risk Myocardial infarctions · people at any baseline risk of CVD It is very uncertain whether effect of reducing saturated fat changes myocardial infarctions compared with usual saturated fat on CVD risk (very low certainty). Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.9 [0.8, 1.01] | 11 studies · 53167 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.