Question · asked by 1 review

38% SDF solution (applied biannually) vs 38% SDF solution (applied annually): Caries arrest

Population
Children with dentine carious lesions (ICDAS 4-5) in primary teeth
Intervention
38% SDF solution (applied biannually)
Comparison
38% SDF solution (applied annually)
Outcome
Caries arrest

Twice-yearly 38% SDF was reported to arrest more caries than once-yearly application (24-month rates 91% vs 79%; ungraded).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
38% SDF applied twice yearly (biannual) vs 38% SDF applied once yearly (annual)
Caries arrest · Children with dentine carious lesions (ICDAS 4-5) in primary teeth · 24 months, Biannual vs annual application
Twice-yearly 38% SDF was reported to arrest more caries than once-yearly application (24-month rates 91% vs 79%; ungraded).
Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. (2022) All outcomes
Caries arrest rate (%) 91% (twice-yearly) vs 79% (once-yearly) at 24 monthsNot reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review.
2022 All outcomes
August 202035Low / Low
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.