Question · asked by 1 review
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone: Bad breath (halitosis)
- Population
- Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
- Intervention
- Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing
- Comparison
- Toothbrushing alone
- Outcome
- Bad breath (halitosis)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone Bad breath (halitosis) · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes | Not estimable. No included study assessed bad breath as an outcome. (See comment) | 0 studies | No studies found |
Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone Bad breath (halitosis) · Dentate adults aged 16 years and older The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults (2012) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD009857, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2013-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Interdental brushing plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.