Probiotics vs control: Serious adverse events
- Population
- patients with acute pancreatitis
- Intervention
- Probiotics
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Serious adverse events
It is very uncertain whether probiotics changes serious adverse events compared with control (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Probiotics vs control Serious adverse events · patients with acute pancreatitis It is very uncertain whether probiotics changes serious adverse events compared with control (very low certainty). Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 17.89 [1.05, 304.59] | 1 study · 298 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enteral nutrition formulations for acute pancreatitis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Probiotics vs placebo · adult patients after liver transplantation. · 1 review
- Probiotics vs 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) (mesalazine) · people with active UC · 1 review
- Probiotics vs placebo · people with active UC · 1 review
- Probiotics vs placebo · children with Hirschsprung's disease (HD) · 1 review
- Probiotics vs placebo · children with chronic constipation without a physical explanation · 1 review
- Probiotics vs placebo · children (4 to 18 years) with functional abdominal pain disorders · 1 review
- Probiotics vs magnesium oxide · children with chronic constipation without a physical explanation · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.