Question · asked by 1 review

Self‐monitoring vs intermittent glucose monitoring: Caesarean section

Population
women with gestational diabetes mellitus
Intervention
Self‐monitoring
Comparison
intermittent glucose monitoring
Outcome
Caesarean section

Self‐monitoring showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with periodic glucose monitoring (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Self‐monitoring vs periodic glucose monitoring
Caesarean section · women with gestational diabetes mellitus
Self‐monitoring showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with periodic glucose monitoring (low certainty).
Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.18 [0.61, 2.27]2 studies · 400 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.